Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | SuperHeavy256's commentslogin

> it really can become the Year of the Linux Desktop. Gnome has genuinely gotten pretty great in the last couple years, and I think a lot of former Windows would genuinely like it if they gave it a chance

This comment could have been written at any point in the past 20 years.


I ran Enlightement + GNOME at work... on OS/2... circa 1999/2000. Wasn't even that bad. Also on linux of course.

Since then it comes down to someone wanting to go deeper than the surface and that's not for everyone, particularily if they are busy.

Pain can get the attention of even the busiest people so I really hope they keep making user suffer like this because that is the best driver away from windows and off the plantation.


I wouldn’t say 20 years, I think the tides turned somewhat when AMD opened up their drivers around ~10 years ago and really turned when Valve released Proton in 2018. Prior to that it was still kind of hard for me to recommend Linux to people.

A browser being based on Chromium has nothing to do with how private it is. Yes you are furthering an internet monopoly by using chromium. But there is noncorrelation between being based of Chromium and Privacy.


Yes it has, unless they plan to do significant changes to how the relevant JS APIs function, which is usually prohibitively expensive to maintain. Standard Chromium allows websites to fetch a lot of fingerprintable bits, this is even true for Brave. Tracking protection on Chromium is a joke.

Firefox on the other hand is better in this respect and even has a setting explicitly for resisting fingerprinting.


Last time I checked, Brave was actually the best-in-class for resisting fingerprinting.


Calling Brave "best-in-class for resisting fingerprinting" is quite bold. Especially when it's so easily disproven.

Try some good fingerprint testing sites on Brave and see what comes up (those results alone should chock you). Then try the same sites on Firefox with privacy.resistFingerprinting=true. Unless some truly revolutionary initiatives have been taken at Brave since last I checked, you will see Firefox do A LOT better than Brave.

Brave suck at resisting fingerprinting. It may be better than other Chromium-based browsers, but it's still pathetic.


> Try some good fingerprint testing sites on Brave

Um. Have you tried this? Because obviously based on my comment I've done this before (and I've of course included Firefox).

I just did this again and sites tell me Brave has a randomized fingerprint. Firefox's is "unique". A specific example: the EFF Cover Your Tracks website[1] said that both browsers convey 18.21 bits of identifying information.

Additionally, if you need to enable a certain setting for best performance, that browser is obviously worse for purpose, given that the vast majority of people don't change settings.

[1] https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/


I actually did, but admittedly it was maybe 4 years ago. Brave vs Firefox. Brave gave the fingerprinter a lot of information about my hardware including the exact model of my GPU, while Firefox did not.

I think I wrote some report at one time about this issue, so it was a bit more than just surface level testing. Chromium was always a disapointment whenever I attempted a comparison.

I think a more fair comparison would be today's Brave vs some hardened Firefox such as Librewolf, Mullvad Browser or even Tor Browser. Because the issue is not how vanilla Chromium or Firefox perform, but how well they can be hardened in practice.

Worth noting is that Brave does better when it comes to compatibility, because it leaves WebGL and other APIs enabled, while something like Tor Browser will disable those for privacy reasons. It hints at different priorities between these projects.


Man complains about AI giving him a starting point to do his work from.


I have been using Obsidian for 5 years and I strongly agree with this. My solution is just occasionally clicking random notes in my vault and reading them, 5-7 notes at a time. I do this a couple of times in a month


There's also a core plugin for opening a random note. I believe it adds a command prompt (or whatever they call it) option and a little die icon on the left side.


snark is not productive.


What form of comment on an online forum _would be_ productive?


Why do you think HN is a place to engage in a productive (necessarily means resulting in something) discussion that would improve BART? Do you think this audience is in any way qualified to discuss the monetary or tech troubles of a uniparty government run service?

Instead, we could have an interesting discussion, maybe even one involving technology, that nerds would enjoy!

You don't have to be an activist wherever you go. In fact, it's almost alway inappropriate soap boxing/virtue signaling.


Cat memes. But HN doesn't support image comments.


I love cosmo, thanks @jart for developing.


Not everything needs to be about AI. Not everything should be.


Ok, but if you’re a horse in the 1920’s it seems prudent to consider automobiles


Given the modus operandi of the AI world, it might be more prudent to consider dogfood factories.


Horse to automobile is not the same as AI to not using AI.


Surely horse world will track this.


This is a negative comment. The author is someone who is clearly struggling, and trying to do her best to make ends meet by working multiple jobs that she makes clear she is desperately in search of. She also can't use her hands and is in chronic pain. Please, have some empathy.


I have empathy but it's tempered by realism. Very few people make a sustaining income from writing, almost all of them supplement some other source of income or subsist.

Editing and proofing may be a better deal. My partner did this for over 25 years and rarely exceeded the taxable income threshold.


The perhaps unsatisfactory answer is you land a day job with a company that has a significant writing component, e.g. various content marketing roles but other types of marketing as well or analyst work. It's not the "great American novel" but I was, to a large degree, essentially a professional writer for over 20 years. And latterly I definitely worked with a lot of people who would probably have preferred to be independent writers but found pleasure in having a fairly well-paid career with a company.

I do know some successful freelancers but they're the generally fairly well-known exception (and are presumably still not making the kind of money many on this board would consider great).


Grant writing. I've done that for years. It's using your writing and analysis skills. Again, not the next great novel, but it does afford you the opportunity and income to write in your spare time, while doing a job that isn't too demanding.


Having done editing and proofing for a few years, I can say that it paid the rent and kept me fed, but didn't do much more than that.


I have the same thing as her and I built an off-grid homestead with my stupid useless arms, and I type until they’re so numb it’s like watching a hen peck for feed.

It never even occurred to me to make it a core part of my identity - it’s just pain and numbness, and they aren’t about to drop off and catch fire, even if it feels like it sometimes.


In the dictionary if you look up the term 'pessimist' it shows you a picture of the author of this article.


I respect the prioritization. It doesn't actually need the best web services, it really only needs enough to play Mario kart online.


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: