Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is the fundamental weakness of Rails. You can't just "do Rails" because the UI out of the box isn't usable. You've always had to add something on whether that was Bootstrap 10 years ago or React today. It's always been a bolt on and always has been changing.




I haven’t really found this to be true. You probably wouldn’t want to build Figma in Rails, but the average SaaS CRUD app is a perfect fit for Rails with a sprinkling of Turbo Frames.

It’s usually the lack of non-React knowledge to know what does or doesn’t require React.


That's a weakness, and strength, of all server-browser architectures. The world (or Apple) decided that a unified front and backend (ala Flash/Flex) wasn't optimal.

Huh? HTML is sitting right there and it's out of the box with Rails. CSS3 is basically scss now.

I don't understand the aversion to actually writing HTML and CSS!


Which framework is actually just „do X“? Good frameworks should be easily extendable with other technologies.



Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: